A lot of badges slapped on product packaging will try to convince you plastics and other wares are good for the planet. They’re lying
By
Leslie Horn Peterson
Hey team, and welcome back to one5c. Here’s a mental bumper sticker for the holiday shopping season: Sustainability is not something you can buy. Of course, companies will do their very best to convince you otherwise—that the secret to unforking the planet lies within their brown paper packaging (“look! leaves!”). And they’ll throw all kinds of terms at you to “prove” it. That’s why I asked Leslie to dig in and surface the most-common greenwashed words you’ll see this season.
Also today, we’ve rounded up four things you can read in 15 minutes to wrap your brain around the Fifth National Climate Assessment, a regular report card on the country’s progress in mitigating the effects of the climate crisis. If you’re finding these cheat sheets handy, please share one5c with your besties. —Corinne
During this extra-spendy time of year, companies work overtime to reel eco-conscious consumers in. That can mean labels and descriptions touting products as “sustainable” or “non-toxic,” or simply cardboard packaging laden with nature and animal motifs. It’s nothing new: Greenwashing has been around since the 1980s, like a comfy blanket that makes folks think they’re buying something that’s good for the Earth. It’s good for business, too—by 2030, the sustainability market is predicted to be worth $62 billion. Don’t be swayed.
“This notion that we can buy our way out of the climate crisis is incorrect,” says Sabs Katz, partnerships lead and co-founder of Intersectional Environmentalist, a climate justice nonprofit. “The assumption is if we switch all our products to more eco-friendly or sustainable ones, then we’re absolved of any other contributions that we might have to the climate crisis.”
Products that are actually gentler on the planet will be bolstered by evidence, research, and special certifications. Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission is in the process of updating its “green guides,” targeting phrases like “recyclable” and “zero carbon.” Official guidance notwithstanding, there are would-be green markers you will undoubtedly encounter as you browse the aisles this holiday season.
Keep an eye out for these bits of nonsense:
Made with ocean-bound plastic. Hahahaha. File this claim as impossible to prove. Sure, the plastic those shoes or guitar picks were made from might havebeen discarded in the ocean eventually, but that’s not necessarily a certitude. Even if it were true, it’s a drop in the proverbial bucket: Only about 5% of plastic was recycled in 2021, we produce 400 million tons of it each year, and about 14 million tons lands in the ocean.
Made with recycled plastic. This doesn’t mean what you might think. “It’s worth questioning whether that is post-consumer recycled plastic or new virgin plastic,” says Katz. It’s become common for companies to make things out of virgin plastic, or scraps from their own manufacturing process, and call them “recycled.”
Biodegradable. Although this one sounds nice (bio = natural, and natural = good), the simple truth is that everything biodegrades—but sometimes it takes centuries. Plastic is still plastic: It’s going to break down into microplastics, and most of it is derived from fossil fuels.
Compostable. Just because a label says “compostable” doesn’t necessarily mean you can toss the product in your pile. There’s a wide chasm between industrial composting and the kind that turns scraps and leaves into fertilizer in your backyard. Compostable plastic must be broken down at a special facility unless it has a label that explicitly states it can be composted at home.
Degradable in a landfill. This relatively new phrase, is, you guessed it, not even a thing. “There is nothing that is expected to degrade in a landfill,” says Nathan Sell, the American Cleaning Institute’s senior director of sustainability who recently saw this badge on product packaging. “Landfills are not conducive to degradation” because they’re simply too packed for anything to break down.
Understand the National Climate Assessment in 15 minutes
On Tuesday, the federal government released its Fifth National Climate Assessment. The report, which comes every four-to-five years, synthesizes thousands of pieces of research into an overview for policy makers on the impacts of the climate crisis nationwide. The document is a doozy: It has more than 2,000 pages and 750 collaborators from a range of agencies and research institutions, and it paints a grim-but-still-hopeful picture of the road ahead. The reading list below will help you grok it in short order:
Survey the takeaways: Bloomberg’soverview of the report and its findings is quick yet thorough, and includes five talking points that everyone should come away with. (If you hit the paywall, it’s also syndicated at Governing.) (Reading time: 4 minutes)
Zoom in on your home: Gristhas summarized the key takeaways from each of the nation’s 10 regions. Check here and jump to your area to understand the greatest threats at your doorstep. (Reading time: 1 minute)
Understand impacts on Indigenous communities. The report, more than any before it, has a strong focus on environmental justice. This story, also from our buds at Grist, explores the need for policymakers to empower Indigenous communities to take the lead on their own mitigation and adaptation efforts. (Reading time: 7 minutes)
Put it all together: The National Climate Assessment wasn’t the only new report card out on Tuesday. The World Resources Institute and the Lancet journal also issued their own warnings about the state of climate action and the crisis’s impacts on health. The Associated Press sums up both here. (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Leslie Horn Peterson
Leslie Horn Peterson is a New York–based journalist covering a broad range of topics—from music and culture to home and families. She’s contributed to Gizmodo, Vice, Deadspin, and Dwell, among other pubs.